1. CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim Recommendations for Facemask and Respirator Use to Reduce 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Transmission, 2009 (Historical Archive), Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/masks.htm (accessed October 14, 2010).
  2. CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim Guidance on Infection Control Measures for 2009 H1N1 Influenza in Healthcare Settings, Including Protection of Healthcare Personnel (Historical Archive), Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/ guidelines_infection_control.htm (accessed October 14, 2010).
  3. OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response Guidance for Healthcare Workers and Healthcare Employers. U.S. Department of Labor. OSHA pub# 3328-05, 2007, Available from: http://osha.gov/Publications/3328... (accessed October 14, 2010).
  4. CFR, Code of Federal Regulations. Respiratory Protective Devices, Title 42, Part 84, 1995, 30336-30404.
  5. Rengasamy, A.; Zhuang, Z.; BerryAnn, R. Respiratory protection against bioaerosols: Literature review and research needs. American Journal of Infection Control, 32(6), 2004, 345-354.
  6. Bałazy, A. et al. Do N95 respirators provide 95% protection level against airborne viruses, and how adequate are surgical masks? American Journal of Infection Control, 34(2), 2006, 51-57.
  7. Eninger, R.M. et al. Filter performance of N99 and N95 facepiece respirators against viruses and ultrafine particles. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 52(5), 2008, 385-396.
  8. Qian, Y. et al. Performance of N95 respirators: Filtration efficiency for airborne microbial and inert particles. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 59(2), 1998, 128-132.
  9. Brosseau, L.M.; McCullough, N.V.; Vesley, D. Mycobacterial aerosol collection efficiency of respirator and surgical mask filters under varying conditions of flow and humidity. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 1997, 12, 435-445.
  10. McCullough, N.V.; Brosseau, L.M.; Vesley, D. Collection of three bacterial aerosols by respirator and surgical mask filters under varying conditions of flow and relative humidity. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 41, 1997, 677-690.
  11. IOM, Institute of Medicine. Committee on the Development of Reusable Facemasks for Use During an Influenza Pandemic. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Board on Health Sciences Policy, and National Academies Press. Reusability of facemasks during an influenza pandemic: facing the flu. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. 2006.
  12. Viscusi, D.J. et al. Evaluation of the Filtration Performance of 21 N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators after Prolonged Storage. American Journal of Infection Control, 37, 2009, 381-386.
  13. NIOSH, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory. Respirator Trusted-Source Information Page, 2009, Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics... (accessed October 14, 2010).
  14. Viscusi, D.J.; King, W.P.; Shaffer, R.E. Effect of decontamination on the filtration efficiency of two filtering facepiece respirator models. Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection, 24, 2007, 93-107.
  15. Viscusi D.J. et al. Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 53(8), 2009, 815-827.
  16. Fisher, E. et al. Development of a Test System to Apply Virus Containing Particles to Air Permeable Materials for the Evaluation of Decontamination Procedures for Filtering Facepiece Respirators. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75(6), 2009, 1500-1507.
  17. Fisher, E.; Shaffer, R. A Method to Determine the Available UV-C Dose for the Decontamination of Filtering Facepiece Respirators. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2010.
  18. Vo, E.; Rengasamy, S.; Shaffer, R. Development of a test system to evaluate procedures for decontamination of respirators containing viral droplets. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75(23), 2009, 7303-7309.
  19. Brown, R.C. et al. Effect of industrial aerosols on the performance of electrically charged filter material. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 32, 1998, 271-294.
  20. Moyer, E.S.; Bergman, M.S. Electrostatic N-95 respirator filter media efficiency degradation resulting from intermittent sodium chloride aerosol exposure. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 15(8), 2000, 600-608.
  21. Barrett, L.W.; Rousseau, A.D. Aerosol loading performance of electret filter media. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 59, 1998, 532-539.
  22. Blackford, D.B. et al. Alteration in the performance of electrostatic filters caused by exposure to aerosols. Proceedings of the Fourth World Filtration Congress, Ostende, Belgium, 1986, 7.27-7.33.
  23. Kanaoka, C.; Emi, H.; Ishiguro, T. Time dependency of collection performance of electret filter. In: Liu, B.Y.H; Pui, D.Y.H; Fissan, H.J., editors. Aerosols, New York: Elsevier Science Publishing, 1984, 613-616.
  24. Van Turnhout, J. Electret Split Fibres for High-Efficiency Filtration of Polluted Air. In: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Electrets and Dielectrics. Sao Carlos, Brazil, 1975, 87-96.
  25. Martin, S.B.; Moyer, E.S. Electrostatic Respirator Filter Media: Filter Efficiency and Most Penetrating Particle Size Effects. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 15(8), 2000, 609-617.
  26. FDA, Food and Drug Administration. Masks and N95 respirators, 2009, Available from: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/.. General Hospital Devicesand Supplies / Personal Protective Equipment / ucm055977.htm (accessed October 14, 2010).
  27. Pottage, T. et al. Evaluation of hydrogen peroxide gaseous disinfection systems to decontaminate viruses. Journal of Hospital Infection, 74, 2010, 55-61.
  28. Rengasamy, S.; Eimer, B.C.; Shaffer, R. E. Comparison of nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-approved and CE marked particulate filtering facepiece respirators. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 53(2), 2009, 117-128.

Пошук Всі результати